.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to RTTP POSTER.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="RTTP%20POSTER:1036374"][QUOTE="arilliusbm:1036363"]He's honest. What more could one ask for? Honest opinions are better than indifference. It's my honest opinion that old In Flames is classic. I could care less if someone disagrees, but it's nice to see the other side of the argument. [/QUOTE] I wouldn't say my stance is one of .... indifference. I like knowing what other people like. It just has zero bearing on if I like something or not. Conservationist can say all he wants about what albums or artists or whatever are good or bad. It has no weight on the the subject being judged. Everyone has a different point of view. There really is no best or good or bad when it comes to something that cannot be quantified. If someone said "michael jordan was the best basketball player ever because he (insert sports fact here)", it is a quantifiable conclusion due to data and research. Art cannot (in my opinion) be quantified as good or bad. It is what the end user perceives it as. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.010 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][